← The ShipLock Log vs Claude Artifacts

Claude built your app.
It lives in a tab.

June 2026 · 4 min read

Claude Artifacts are genuinely great. You describe what you want, Claude builds it in real time, and you can interact with it immediately. It's one of the best prototyping experiences I've ever used.

But there's a problem: it lives in a conversation.

Yes, you can publish an artifact and share the link. But it's one public link with one mode: anyone who has it sees the same thing. There's no private setting, no invite list, no way to revoke access for one person and keep it for another. And behind the page there is nothing. No data store. Someone fills in your form and those answers go nowhere. A week later the artifact is buried under forty newer chats, and the only "dashboard" of your apps is your scroll finger.

What the missing layer looks like

Let's say you built an RSVP form in Claude. Perfect for your backyard BBQ. Forty people are coming and you want to collect names, headcounts, and dietary restrictions.

With Artifacts, here's what happens:

What you actually need:

"The link is the password." When you set an app to link-only access, the URL itself is the credential. Anyone who has it can submit. Nobody else can. No accounts required for your guests.

The workflow that actually works

Build it in Claude. Copy the HTML. Deploy to ShipLock in 30 seconds. That's it. The app gets a subdomain, a data store, and access controls you set. Claude did the hard part of writing the code. ShipLock handles everything after that.

The two tools are complementary. Claude is a remarkable code generator. ShipLock is the missing runtime for what it generates.

Deploy your first app free

Live URL, data store, access control. No credit card. Under 30 seconds.

Get started free →